| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home > Research Help > History of Science > Student Publications > Is it peer-reviewed? Is This Item Peer-reviewed? This page gives broad guidelines determining whether an article, news item, or other document is peer-reviewed. What does "peer-reviewed" mean? If an article has been peer-reviewed before being published, it means that the article has been read by other people in the same field of study. That is, "peers" of the author--scientist in the same field, for example--have read the article and commented on it. Those reviewers have noted typos and possible errors, but has also given a judgment about whether or not the article should be published by the journal to which it was submitted. How do I find "peer-reviewed" materials?
What kinds of materials are *not* peer-reviewed?
If a piece of information wasn't peer-reviewed, does that mean that I can't trust it at all? No, not at all. For example, the preprints and e-prints collected by and submitted to well-known databases such as arXiv (mainly covering physics) and CiteSeer (mainly covering computer science) are trustworthy, as are the databases and web pages produced by trustworthy entities such as the National Library of Medicine, the Smithsonian Institution, and the American Cancer Society. Then how should I evaluate the information and the web pages that I find? Please look at the guides from the libraries at Virginia Tech and UC Berkeley. These guides will point out the important clues that you should always look for when deciding to depend on a web page for information. One last thing: open-web pages disappear! Your professor or your readers may not be able to find a reference that you cited because that page from the open web is no longer there. The article "Going, Going, Gone: Lost Internet References" will make you think twice about using open web pages to back up what you're saying. Librarian: Sue Vazakas, 410-516-4153, svazakas@jhu.edu | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||